Why Masked ICE Agents Should Concern Every American
In a nation grounded in the Rule of Law, the aggressive tactics of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) require careful scrutiny. This is not just an immigration issue. It is not a partisan issue. It is a constitutional issue, and it should concern anyone who values a legal system built on fairness, transparency, accountability, and the Rule of Law.
Recent news reports show masked ICE agents operating without visible identification and making arrests without warrants. Some detentions are based on little more than skin color, language spoken, or proximity to locations like a Home Depot. Even Native Americans with family ties going back well before this nation was founded have been stopped because of the color of their skin. Targeting people based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or appearance rather than probable cause and without any due process is not only unsettling, it is impermissible under the U.S. Constitution. As a federal appeals court recently made clear, “apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent, particular location, and type of work, even when considered together—describe only a broad profile and do not demonstrate reasonable suspicion for any particular stop.”
ICE’s use of unidentified, masked agents runs counter to the principle that government actions in a democracy should be exercised openly and be subject to public oversight. Masked agents are hard if not impossible to hold accountable, eroding public trust and increasing the risk of abuse without accountability. Their presence creates confusion and fear, prompting some people, regardless of legal status, to avoid work and public spaces, or to seek needed help from the police or even the courts.
Many ICE arrests appear to be happening without any judicial involvement. People are transported to holding facilities without being told the legal basis for their detention, without access to counsel, and without being promptly brought before a neutral judicial officer for a showing of a legal basis for detention– in other words, without being subject to the Rule of Law. These practices violate fundamental protections that apply under the Due Process Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment to all persons within our borders. The erosion of constitutional rights should alarm anyone who values our freedoms.
Rather than investigate or restrain these practices, Congress has greatly increased ICE’s budget. Now running into billions of dollars, ICE’s funding is greater than the military budgets of many countries. And while expanding the agency’s capacity to detain people, Congress approved no corresponding increases in oversight. There was little money to increase the number of immigration judges, despite the obvious need for immigration courts to process those detained within the protections of Due Process, Habeas Corpus, and the very spirit of the Bill of Rights.
Why This Should Matter to You
Our Constitution protects all “persons” within the United States, citizen or not, from arbitrary detention, unreasonable searches, denial of due process and denial of counsel. These constitutional rights exist to limit the power of government to deny the fundamental rights of due process under the law.
The erosion of civil liberties rarely comes all at once. It arrives gradually, often justified by a claim that these “technicalities” of law can be ignored because urgent action is required.
Reasonable people can disagree about how to secure borders or manage immigration. But that debate must take place within the framework of the law and the Constitution. What is at stake here is whether the government is bound by the Constitution—whether it must follow the rules that protect all of us.
We all have reason to be concerned.
What you can do
This is a time for attention, not apathy. We should be asking: Are these practices lawful? Are they consistent with our legal and constitutional values? If not, what must be done to reform them?
Each of us has a role to play in upholding the core principles of our Constitution. Stay informed by seeking out news from a wide range of credible sources – even those with different viewpoints. When appropriate, engage in respectful, thoughtful conversations. Share what you learn with others, whether in person or online. Think critically. A well-informed public that holds its government accountable is essential to preserving a free and just society.
We don’t need to agree on immigration to agree on this: The Constitution matters. Due process matters. A fair and accountable system matters. The Rule of Law matters.
And if we fail to defend those principles today—when they’re being tested—we may find they won’t be there tomorrow when we all need them most.
Additional Statements
The Great Writ – Habeas Corpus into the Twenty-First Century
At a hearing in Congress on May 20, 2025, U.S. Senator Maggie-Hassan (D-NH) asked Homeland Security Secretary Kristin Noem: “What is habeas corpus?” She responded: “Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the President has to be able to remove people from...
The Justice Department is Threatening The Rule of Law
On its website, the U.S. Department of Justice states its mission: “to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights.”
First Statement
We are a group of over 400 Georgia lawyers united by our belief that the current national administration has deployed a series of policies and actions that threaten the Rule of Law in our country.