A Free Press Cannot Exist Under Threat of Government Retaliation
The founding fathers wanted to make sure that people and publishers could disagree with the King’s version of events without punishment or censorship. That’s why the First Amendment promises free speech and a free press.
Government leaders who dislike a news story are, of course, free to speak out. What they are not free to do is use the power of their office to punish or censor those who publish news that contradicts or questions their policies. They are not free to strip a broadcaster of its license to operate.
Yet, that is what the administration threatens over reporting on the war in Iran.
“Broadcasters . . . are running hoaxes and news distortions,” Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr complained on social media over the weekend.
“The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not,” Carr wrote.
He correctly quotes the law. Those who use the airwaves are required to serve the public in a way that newspapers are not. But serving the public does not mean adhering to the administration’s narrative.
Where Carr goes wrong is in confusing the public interest with the administration’s interests. Those interests often diverge, even conflict, which is exactly why we have a First Amendment.
“The press was to serve the governed, not the governors,” Supreme Court Associate Justice Hugo Black wrote in the Pentagon Papers case in 1971. Exposing government deception is “paramount” during time of war, he said, when citizens are called to fight on foreign soil.
That was Vietnam, not Iran, and times were different. But the core mission of the First Amendment has not changed. Then, as now, and as the founders knew in the 18th century, newsrooms, whether print or broadcast, must be free to resist government intimidation without fear of being silenced.
Additional Statements
When Courts Stop Trusting the Government
Courts are openly rejecting the idea that the government deserves deference. This rejection is across a spectrum of cases.
Partisan Judges Are Inconsistent with Basic Fairness – Both in the Olympics and Our Courts
Remember how Russian judges have long outraged Olympic fans for ruling in favor of “their side” in so many competitions? At the 2014 Sochi Olympic figure skating competition, most observers believed reigning champion Yuna Kim of South Korea had prevailed. Yet two...
A Free Press and National Security
“Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press and that cannot be limited without being lost” said Thomas Jefferson in 1786. The Trump administration has treated fact-based journalism as an enemy to be derided, delegitimized, and defanged. An important battleground...
Invitation: Defending the Rule of Law Webinar
In partnership with Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG) we are excited to announce our first webinar, Defending Democracy: How Georgia Lawyers Can Take Action on April 29 and 12 PM
Join Us
We are building a coalition of Georgia attorneys who are committed to the Rule of Law. Please fill out the form if you would like to be part of our initiative to preserve the Rule of Law.
Contact Us
Do you have questions or need to speak with GLRL? Email info@georgialawyersfortheruleoflaw.org, and we'll get back to you as soon as we are able.